Green
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
This is an appeal from the denial of the Commonwealth’s motion for a new trial after a jury found the petitioner, James Green, no longer sexually dangerous in a proceeding brought pursuant to G. L. c. 123A, § 9. In the motion for a new trial, the Commonwealth challenged as erroneous and prejudicial the judge’s instruction that in order to find the petitioner sexually dangerous, the jury must credit the expert opinion testimony of the qualified examiner. The Commonwealth claims that the judge’s instruction was erroneous because it improperly commented on the weight a jury must give to a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Commonwealth v. KellyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
- DutilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. GradyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re ChapmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Commonwealth v. G.F.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
- In re R.B.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Commonwealth v. BeattyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2023
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.