Legal Opinion

Ieppert v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 11, 1995No. 0826-92, 0827-92, 0829-92 and 0830-92Published

1Opinion of the Court

908 S.W.2d 217 (1995)

Steven Louis IEPPERT, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

Nos. 0826-92, 0827-92, 0829-92 and 0830-92.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

October 11, 1995.

Lawrence B. Mitchell, Dallas, for appellant.

Pamela Sullivan Berdanier, Assistant District Attorney, Dallas, Robert A. Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION ON APPELLANT'S PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

MEYERS, Judge.

According to judgments entered in the trial court, appellant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault in four cases consolidated for prosecution. His…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · McCORMICK; Dissent · Mansfield; Dissent · Keller.

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API