Legal Opinion

Shoemake v. Shoemake

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1991No. A91A0673PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sognier, Chief Judge.

Rex Shoemake brought a personal injury suit against Abby Shoemake in September 1990. In response, Ms. Shoemake filed a verified answer in which she averred that she and Mr. Shoemake were married on January 18, 1990 and “have been married ever since.” Ms. Shoemake then filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of interspousal tort immunity. OCGA § 19-3-8. The trial court considered the facts set forth in Ms. Shoemake’s verified answer (as it was authorized to do, see Foskey v. Smith, 159 Ga. App. 163, 164-165 (283 SE2d 33)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Geico v. DickeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  3. Foskey v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Davidson v. American Fitness Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Boone v. BooneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. Bassett v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. New v. HubbardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API