Legal Opinion

New v. Hubbard

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 19, 1992No. A92A1184PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cooper, Judge.

We granted this interlocutory appeal to review the trial court’s ruling that interspousal immunity doctrine does not bar third-party actions for indemnity or contribution against a plaintiffs spouse.

Plaintiff, appellant’s wife, was injured in an automobile collision involving two automobiles — one driven by appellant, and one driven by appellee Hubbard. Plaintiff sued appellee Hubbard, and appellees Hubbard and State Farm filed a third-party complaint against appel lant seeking indemnification or contribution. Appellant moved for summary judgment based on interspousal immunity,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Shell v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  3. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Shell v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  2. Mayer v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Mayer v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API