New v. Hubbard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Cooper, Judge.
We granted this interlocutory appeal to review the trial court’s ruling that interspousal immunity doctrine does not bar third-party actions for indemnity or contribution against a plaintiffs spouse.
Plaintiff, appellant’s wife, was injured in an automobile collision involving two automobiles — one driven by appellant, and one driven by appellee Hubbard. Plaintiff sued appellee Hubbard, and appellees Hubbard and State Farm filed a third-party complaint against appel lant seeking indemnification or contribution. Appellant moved for summary judgment based on interspousal immunity,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robeson v. International Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Shell v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Shell v. WattsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gates v. GatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Mayer v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Mayer v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997