Legal Opinion

Aaronson v. Lindsay & Hauer International Ltd.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 1999No. Docket 203776PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holbrook, Jr., J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right from two trial court orders granting summary disposition to defendant. We reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant is a Canadian corporation, with offices located in Toronto, Ontario, and New York City, New York. Plaintiff is the widow of Gilbert Aaronson (hereafter Aaronson). In April 1991, Aaronson, who was a Michigan resident, contacted defendant’s Arizona agent and requested that defendant’s sales literature be mailed to him. Shortly thereafter, Aaronson initiated direct contact with defendant by telephoning…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oberlies v. Searchmont Resort, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Electrolines, Inc. v. Prudential Assurance Co., Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. National Wildlife Federation v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. W H Froh, Inc v. DomanskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. LGT ENTERPRISES, LLC v. HoffmanDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API