Legal Opinion
W H Froh, Inc v. Domanski
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 2002No. Docket 227596PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGage, J.
The question in this case is whether defendant possessed sufficient contacts with Michigan to justify the circuit court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over him. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from the circuit court’s grant of summary disposition to defendant pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(1). We reverse and remand.
i
Plaintiff W. H. Froh, Inc., was a Michigan corporation that operated in Macomb County, Michigan. Froh provided trucking services and equipment to Campbell Soup Company and Vlasic Foods, Inc. Plaintiffs William and Sharlene Neely, Nevada residents, were the sole shareholders in Froh.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michael Sullivan v. LG Chem Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Yoost v. CaspariMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lease Acceptance Corp. v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Coast to Coast Produce, LLC v. AMCO Produce CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
- Five Brothers Mortgage Company v. the McCue Mortgage CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.