Legal Opinion

Joseph J. Freed & Associates, Inc. v. Cassinelli Apparel Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1986No. 85-3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The central issue involved in the cause sub judice is whether the trial court acted properly in ordering a forfeiture of the leased premises by finding a material breach of the lease covenant requiring uniformity of business hours. More specifically, we must determine whether the trial court abused its discretion in weighing the equities of this cause in favor of a forfeiture of the leased premises.

The appellant submits the usual equitable maxims in urging a reversal of the decision below, i.e., that equity abhors a forfeiture; that a forfeiture clause, when ambiguous, must be strictly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Steiner v. CusterOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Chester Township v. Geauga County Budget CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fodor v. First National Supermarkets, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. City of StowOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Takis, L.L.C. v. C.D. Morelock Properties, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Prokos v. HinesOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API