Legal Opinion

Sagransky v. Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1928No. Appeal No. 234PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal is from judgment for $582.50 for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in a suit on a fire insurance policy in the amount of—

“$1,300. On merchandise generally, including packages, wrappers, and labels of all' kinds, his own, held in trust or on consignment, sold but not removed, for which the' assured may be otherwise liable, being the stock of tailer shop.

$200. On fixtures......and all other articles used in the business as conducted, and not covered under stock item above.”

The statement of claim alleged fire loss of stock and fixtures as shown by a copy of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. TerheydenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Moore v. Luzerne CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Zell v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Kidder Elevator Interlock Co. v. MuckleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  5. Johnson v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCoy v. Home InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API