Legal Opinion
Plummer v. Pennsylvania R.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 7, 1929No. 4221PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALSCHULER, Circuit Judge.
The aer tion was brought under the first section of the “Adamson Act” (45 USCA § 65), to recover, by a railroad employe alleged to have been engaged in the operation of trains, for services rendered in excess of eight hours a day, for a period of over six years. The various counts of the declaration alleged, in words or in substance, that the plaintiff began his employment in January, 1921, “to ride and assist in the operation of the trains of defendant engaged in Interstate Commerce, and to watch, protect and guard said trains and the goods, merchandise, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilson v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- McCarthy v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Vogt v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corman Railroad Company Memphis Line v. PalmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- State v. WoolleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Miller v. Mississippi & S. V. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- R.J. Corman Railroad v. PalmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- State v. WoolleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.