Legal Opinion

Stier, Kent & Canady, Inc. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 12, 1994No. 2262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

This appeal arises out of a house remodeling contract between Earl and Antonio Jackson and Stier, Kent & Canady, Inc. and SK & C’s ensuing mechanic’s lien foreclosure action submitted to arbitration by consent order pursuant to the contract. The issue on appeal concerns whether the trial court erred in adding attorney fees and costs to the arbitration award. We reverse.

SK & C and the Jacksons entered into a contract for SK & C to renovate and remodel the Jacksons’ Charleston home. Upon the Jacksons’ refusal to pay, SK & C filed a mechanic’s lien for approximately $84,000 and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First Savings Bank v. McLeanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. Batten v. HowellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Sentry Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Mariner's Cay Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  4. Ruscon Construction Co. v. Beaufort-Jasper Water AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  5. Stanley Smith & Sons, Inc. v. DumasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TyndallCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. South Carolina Department of Probation Parole & Pardon Services v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API