Legal Opinion

Johnny Bennett v. Bryan Stirling

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2016No. 16-3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge KING and Judge HARRIS joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Johnny Bennett challenges the imposition of a capital sentence in the South Carolina courts. While recognizing full well the deferential standard of review under AEDPA, we nonetheless agree with the district court that the sentencing was suffused with racially coded references to a degree that made a fair proceeding impossible. We therefore affirm the judgment of the district court granting habeas relief.

I

Bennett, a black man, was convicted in 1995…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Freddie Owens v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. Mikal Mahdi v. Bryan StirlingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  3. United States v. Dylann RoofCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  4. Andrew v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2026
  5. Brown v. ClarkeDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API