Legal Opinion

Joel Bailey Davis Inc. v. Poole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 1942No. 14258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding Justice.

Notwithstanding there was a decree-of divorce as well as a judgment for alimony, the parties to this judgment may for convenience be referred to as the husband and the wife. The obligation of a husband to provide support and maintenance for his wife is a duty imposed by law, and for that reason can not be classified with other obligations which do not involve similar duties. Green v. Beaumont, 179 Ga. 804 (177 S. E. 572). The duty is one in which the public has an interest, and a judgment based thereon, awarding alimony for the wife’s future-maintenance, simply…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estes v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Schooley v. SchooleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  3. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Hannah v. HannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Bates v. BatesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Headrick v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Shepherd v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  3. Columbus Personnel Service v. GachetteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Waters v. AlbaneseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Bradford Furniture Co. v. Storey (In re Storey)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API