Legal Opinion

Zuicarelli v. Clark

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided September 12, 2003No. 2020851PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On April 25, 2000, State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company ("State Farm") and Ophelia Clark (State Farm and Clark are hereinafter collectively referred to as "the plaintiffs") sued Tina Zuicarelli in the Chilton Circuit Court ("the trial court") seeking damages for an automobile accident in which Clark alleged that she suffered personal injuries and property damage caused by Zuicarelli; State Farm sought to enforce its subrogation rights as Clark's automobile insurance carrier. After the plaintiffs were unable to serve Zuicarelli by either process server or certified mail, they sought to…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Armstrong Business Services, Inc. v. AmSouth BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Ex Parte Alfa Mut. General Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  3. Zuicarelli v. ClarkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API