Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BOARD OF COM'RS, BOULDER COUNTY v. Eason

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1998No. 96CA1888Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge RULAND

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the result reached by the majority in Part I of the opinion. However, I conclude that defendant’s claim for attorney fees under § 1983 and § 1988, 42 U.S.C. was asserted in full compliance with applicable rules. Therefore, defendant is not precluded from an award of fees for the defense of the appeal in Board of County Commissioners v. Eason, (Colo.App. No. 95CA2207, May 15, 1997)(not selected for official publication){Eason I), and thus I respectfully dissent from the result reached in Part II of the opinion.

C.R.C.P. 57(h)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. ATCIHSON v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  2. Agee v. TRUSTEES OF PEN. BD. OF CUNNINGHAM FIRE PDColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Eason v. Board of County CommissionersColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Subryan v. Regents of the University of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API