Legal Opinion
Eason v. Board of County Commissioners
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 26, 1997No. 96CA1691PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CASEBOLT.
In this action for damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994), plaintiff, W. Robert Eason, appeals the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants, Boulder County Board of County Commissioners (Board) and Graham Billingsley, the county land use director. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
The facts are undisputed. Eason owned commercial property located in Boulder county upon which he operated a storage business using semitrailers. Before 1993, the County had informed Eason that such use was proper under the zoning code. However, in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City & County of Denver v. Block 173 AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. KirvenSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Michaelson v. MichaelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Harborside Refrigerated Services, Inc. v. Howard Vogel Edward BenensonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto RicoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andrew Robinson International, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Keller v. DavidsonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2004
- BOARD OF COM'RS, BOULDER COUNTY v. EasonColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Criste v. City of Steamboat SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Timm v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.