Hartman v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
HOGG, Judge.
Appellant, Jake Hartman, was jointly indicted with John Doe and Richard Roe in the Bullitt Circuit Court for armed robbery, a crime denounced by KRS 433.140. Upon his separate trial, appellant was convicted and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for and during his natural life.
He seeks a reversal of the judgment upon the following grounds: (1) He was entitled to a directed verdict of not guilty; (2) having been indicted for armed robbery with no accusation that he was an aider or ¿better or accomplice, he should not have been tried on the charge of being an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1955
- Nelson v. Commonwealth.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Utterback v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- McKinney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Bailey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Apple v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
- Hunt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972