Rigot v. Conda

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court, where plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and defendants in error were defendants. We shall refer to the parties .as, they appeared in the trial court; or by name,. Plaintiffs’ amended complaint- sets forth .two claims on which recovery was sought, .the first of which was to recover $1,713.00 on behalf of the administrator of the Alex Rigot estate for damage to an automobile, towage charges and funeral expenses. The second claim was by Klebert Rigot, Rose Ramsey and Norma Miller, children of Alex Rigot, to recover tén thousand…