Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Hawaiian Eugenia Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 26, 1984No. 83 Civ. 2751(MEL)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LASKER, District Judge.
Third-Party defendant West of England (“WOE”) moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and 12(b) to quash service and dismiss the complaint on the ground that service of process on WOE’s local attorneys (“the law firm”) was insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over WOE. The motion to quash service and to dismiss the third-party complaint is granted.
WOE is a protection and indemnity insurance association (“P & I Club”) composed of member-shipowners. It is organized under Luxembourgh law with a principal place of business in London, England. It has no place of business in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. The Ss Zoe Colocotroni, Her Engines, Appurtenances, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. BosurgiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Ziegler Bolt and Parts Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Ms. Interpret v. Rawe Druck—Und—Veredlungs—GmbH (In Re Ms. Interpret)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Michelson v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Olympus Corp. v. Dealer Sales & Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- Bennett v. Circus U.S.A.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.