Burnside v. Savier
Oregon Supreme Court
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court sitting in Clackamas county. The respondent in his own right as surviving partner of the two firms of La Rocque, Savier & Co., and Savier & Co., and in his capacity as administrator of the property of each of said partnerships, filed his complaint in equity in said court against said George La Rocque, surviving partner of said firm of La Rocque, Savier & Co., and against Mary A. Savier as widow, and as administrator of the estate of…
Read the full summary
This is an appeal from the Circuit Court sitting in Clackamas county. The respondent in his own right as surviving partner of the two firms of La Rocque, Savier & Co., and Savier & Co., and in his capacity as administrator of the property of each of said partnerships, filed his complaint in equity in said court against said George La Rocque, surviving partner of said firm of La Rocque, Savier & Co., and against Mary A. Savier as widow, and as administrator of the estate of Thomas A. Savier, deceased, who in his lifetime was the third and only other member of said firm, and against Sarah B.,…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, McArthur, <7. :
The question presented by this record for determination *156is as to the extent of the power and jurisdiction of the county court, sitting in probate under section 1071 of the Code. After defining the powers and duties of the “administrator of a partnership ” in a very general way, the section concludes as follows: “In the exercise of his powers and the performance of his duties, the administrator of the partnership is subject to the same limitations and liabilities, and control and jurisdiction of the court, as a general administrator.” Under our law the general…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Jackson v. United States National Bank, Portland, Ore.District Court, D. Oregon · 1957
- Palicio v. BigneOregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Young v. LeeOregon Supreme Court · 1929