Wright-Dalton-Bell-Anchor Store Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. J. O. Sheppard, Judge. Any lien against the wages of Sanders which plaintiff acquired by the garnishment proceedings was vacated and annulled by the proceedings in bankruptcy against Sanders. 30 U. S. Statutes at Large, 1897, 1899, 565; In re Goldberg, 121 Fed. 578; In re Kenney, 97 Fed. 557; In re Reichmann, 91 Fed. 624; In re Higgins, 97 Fed. 775; Bear v. Chase, 99 Fed. 920; Klipstein v. Allen, 136 Fed. 385. Plaintiff’s debt against…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Butler Circuit Court. — Hon. J. O. Sheppard, Judge. Any lien against the wages of Sanders which plaintiff acquired by the garnishment proceedings was vacated and annulled by the proceedings in bankruptcy against Sanders. 30 U. S. Statutes at Large, 1897, 1899, 565; In re Goldberg, 121 Fed. 578; In re Kenney, 97 Fed. 557; In re Reichmann, 91 Fed. 624; In re Higgins, 97 Fed. 775; Bear v. Chase, 99 Fed. 920; Klipstein v. Allen, 136 Fed. 385. Plaintiff’s debt against the defendant was never scheduled in the bankruptcy proceedings and the undisputed evidence is that the plaintiff never…
1Opinion of the CourtNixon, P. J.
This action was commenced on the 11th day of May, 1908, by the respondent filing before a justice of the peace in Butler county a suit upon a promissory note executed by T. A. Sanders and C. C. Hubbs on which the sum of twenty-eight dollars was alleged to be due the plaintiff. On the 27th day of May, 1908, judgment was rendered against the defendant, and on the 11th day of July, 1908, execution was issued on the judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company was summoned as garnishee. The garnishee in due time filed an answer before the justice…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- In re BreslauerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1903
- In re MertensDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1904
- In re KrinskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
3Cited by1 opinion
- Archenhold Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918