Legal Opinion
In re Krinsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 7, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
In Bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, District Judge.
This is a motion on the part of the receiver appointed by the court to punish for contempt Joseph J. ’Harris, Simon Wang, and Abraham D. Levy. On the 14th day of January, 1902, a petition was filed herein by three alleged creditors to have Hiram Krinsky and Abraham Krinsky, composing the firm of Krinsky Bros., adjudged bankrupts. The petition contained the necessary allegations to sustain the prayer for an adjudication, among others that the alleged bankrupts had made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, on the 6th day of January, 1902, to Joseph J.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bryan v. BernheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bank v. ShermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Davis v. BohleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- In re AtkinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1872
- In re South Side R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1874
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re ReedUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1981
- In re GutmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
- In re ScherberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1904
- In re J. W. Lavery & SonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916
- Wright-Dalton-Bell-Anchor Store Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910