Legal Opinion

BANDARIES v. Cassidy

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 2011No. 11-161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAINTER, Judge.

I,Plaintiff, Nathen Madro Bandaries, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his suit pursuant to Defendant’s exception of lis pendens. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The trial court correctly outlined the facts of this case in written reasons for judgment as follows:

Nathen Banderies 1 , plaintiff/respondent filed the present suit against [] Joanna V. Cassidy, defendant/exceptor, on April 21, 2010 in the Tenth Judicial District Court in Natchitoches (hereinafter the “10th JDC lawsuit”). The petition alleges that [ ] Cassidy is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berrigan v. Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, LLPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  2. Domingue v. ABC CORP.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. La. Cotton Ass'n Wkrs'comp. Group Self-Insurance Fund v. Tri-Parish Gin Company, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Coury Moss, Inc. v. CouryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bandaries v. CassidyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. In Re Madro BANDARIESSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  3. In Re Madro BANDARIESSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
  4. Nathan Madro Bandaries v. Joanna CassidyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API