Legal Opinion

State v. Forrest

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2013No. 2012-0415 and 2012-0416Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134,

2013-Ohio-2409.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. FORREST, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Forrest, 136 Ohio St.3d 134,

2013-Ohio-2409.] Because App.R. 26(A)(2) is silent on the issue of who must make the initial determination whether an intradistrict conflict exists, either an en banc court or a panel of the court may make the determination. (Nos. 2012-0415 and 2012-0416—Submitted February 5, 2013—Decided June 12, 2013.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 11AP-291,

2012-Ohio-280

and

2012-Ohio-938.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. United States v. American-Foreign Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. In re J.J.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McFadden v. Cleveland State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. EveretteOhio Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API