Randolph Hills, Inc. v. Whitley

Barnes, J., concurred in part and dissented in part and filed a separate opinion; see page 90, infra.

This will be the last, we hope, of the Marcus,1 Baker 2 Wahler3 Randolph Hills 4 tetralogy. The properties involved in these four cases are contiguous and a part of the property in this case was before us in Baker. It is at once apparent that Marcus, Baker and Wahler will be required reading for anyone seeking a full understanding of this opinion. It should be observed, perhaps, that Wahler was argued the day before this case was argued and that it was decided only two days before our decision…