Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Tuality Healthcare
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 15, 2016No. Case No. 3:14-cv-01498-SIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
Michael H. Simon, District Judge.
Dr. James M. Murphy (“Muiphy”) brings this suit against his former employer, Tuality Healthcare (“Tuality”), under the Uniformed Services Employment .and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4335. Murphy asserts that Tuality violated USERRA in three ways by: (1) failing to reemploy Murphy *922after he completed his military service, in violation of 38 U.S.C. § 4318; (2) discharging Murphy without cause within 180 days of his military service, in violation of 38 U.S.C. § 4316; and (3) discriminating against Murphy because of his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'NCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ashlee Tanner v. Top Notch Transportation LLC, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2026
- Mustafa v. Yuma Regional Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023