Legal Opinion
United States v. Daniel F. Kellington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 7, 2000No. 98-30193Published
1Opinion of the Court
217 F.3d 1084 (9th Cir. 2000)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
DANIEL F. KELLINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE.
No. 98-30193
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Argued and Submitted July 14, 1999
July 7, 2000
[Copyrighted Material Omitted][Copyrighted Material Omitted]
Frank R. Papagni, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Eugene, Oregon, attorney for the plaintiff-appellant.
Norman Sepenuk and James L. Collins, Portland Oregon, attorneys for the defendant-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, District Judge,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.