Legal Opinion

Hoppe v. Bentley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1935No. 23911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER OURIAM.

In this action the plaintiff in error H. H. Hoppe, July 3, 1930, secured a judgment against the defendant in error, Bentley, et al., quieting- his tax title to lots 35 and 36, block 7, Carney Heights addition to Oklahoma City, Okla.

April 23, 1931, Bentley filed a motion to vacate the judgment, which motion, January 23, 1932, was sustained and an order made vacating the judgment. Hoppe excepted and gave notice of' appeal.

The record and evidence established that at the date of the tax deed, J. “W.” Bentley owned the lots, and that this motion was based upon section 1S9, O. S. 1931,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Powell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Barfield Petroleum Co. v. Pickering Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Fliedner v. HincheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Finch v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. White v. Security Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Durham v. SharumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Dailey v. SawatzkySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Smith v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Ward v. McClainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API