Legal Opinion

Dailey v. Sawatzky

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 15, 1949No. 33493PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an action brought by Maud Dailey against Gus Sawatzky, B. C. Sawatzky, and Edwin Wollman to recover on a supersedeas bond.

No service was had on defendant Gus Sawatzky, principal on the bond. The case went to trial as to defendants sureties alone. The trial court entered judgment in their favor on the pleadings.

Plaintiff appeals and assigns this ruling as error.

Plaintiff in her petition, in substance, alleges that on the 28th day of December, 1945, in a forcible entry and de-tainer action then pending in the county court of Custer county, plaintiff, Maud Dailey, recovered judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hurie v. QuiggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Allen v. Hartford Accident & Ind. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Jones v. CabanissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Williams v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Hoppe v. BentleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. U-M Investments v. RayUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. U-M Investments v. RayUtah Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API