Sang Man Shin v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Saitta, J.:
We are asked to determine whether NRS 179.245(5), which prohibits Nevada courts from sealing records concerning sexually based offenses, improperly impinges upon the power of the State Board of *101Pardons Commissioners to issue pardons. While the pardoning power’s reach is expansive, it does not extend to removing the historical fact that a conviction occurred, and it cannot bequeath innocence. Instead, a pardon is an act of forgiveness that restores civil rights and removes most legal consequences of a criminal conviction. We find nothing in Article 5, Section 14…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MGM Mirage v. Nevada Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Tony W. Robertson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- In Re ShinNevada Supreme Court · 2009