Legal Opinion

Sang Man Shin v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2009No. 47995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Saitta, J.:

We are asked to determine whether NRS 179.245(5), which prohibits Nevada courts from sealing records concerning sexually based offenses, improperly impinges upon the power of the State Board of *101Pardons Commissioners to issue pardons. While the pardoning power’s reach is expansive, it does not extend to removing the historical fact that a conviction occurred, and it cannot bequeath innocence. Instead, a pardon is an act of forgiveness that restores civil rights and removes most legal consequences of a criminal conviction. We find nothing in Article 5, Section 14…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
  4. Carlesi v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Banks v. CainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MGM Mirage v. Nevada Insurance Guaranty Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Tony W. Robertson v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
  3. In Re ShinNevada Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API