Legal Opinion

Wrather v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 20, 1933No. 4566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The controlling inquiry is that of whether or not the special circumstances are such as demand summary relief of the appointment of a receiver of the oil property pendente lite. It is concluded that there is a . clear preponderance of evidence considered as a whole, against the propriety of the appointment. The general object of the present receivership is the operation of the oil property, through the progress of the litigation and continuing after final judgment, through a receiver appointed by the court, to prevent persistent acts on the part of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wadley Southern Railway Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Ortiz Oil Co. v. Railroad CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Patton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. FilgoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Crossman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API