Legal Opinion

Patton v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 17, 1933No. 4522PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVY, Justice (after stating the ease as above).

The question for decision on appeal is specifically one of whether or not in the particular case the court was authorized to make the appointment of a receiver to take over the oil well on the application of the state of Texas, moving therefor. The allegations alone in the petition are considered, taking the facts stated as true. As stated in the petition, the controversy appears to be thus initiated: The state of Texas, with joinder therein by the Railroad Commission, through the Attorney General of the state, instituted the suit against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Henrietta v. EustisTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
  3. Continental Trust Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Republic Trust Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Cave v. Mayor of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1886

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Wilkenfeld v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Fleishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Fisher v. First Nat. Bank of San AugustineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Wrather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API