Legal Opinion
Portland v. Yick
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 1904PublishedCited by 24 opinions
Prom Multnomah: Melvin C. George, Judge. Wing H. Yick was convicted of a violation of an ordinance of the City of Portland, relating to lotteries, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
The defendant was convicted in the Municipal Court of the City of Portland of the violation of Ordinance No. 11,336, and appealed to the circuit court, wherein he was again convicted, and now appeals to this court. He is charged with the violation of section 2 of the ordinance, which provides:
“ No person or persons shall within the corporate limits of the City of Portland set up or keep, either as owner, proprietor, keeper, manager, or emyloyé, with or without hire, lessee or otherwise, any house, shop or place for the purpose of selling any lottery ticket, certificate, paper or instrument,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Division of Howard CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Ritchie v. RichardsUtah Supreme Court · 1896
- McDonald v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Solomon v. HughesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Amos v. MosleySupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Emmons v. Southern Pac. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Boyd v. OlcottOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Tipp v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Collins v. City of RadfordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.