Legal Opinion

United States v. James Studley

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 5, 1990No. 90-1078PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSENN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The central issue of this appeal by the Government is whether the district court erred in departing downward from the applicable guidelines in sentencing the defendant for receiving child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Although the district court’s sense of compassion and pragmatism displayed in sentencing the defendant is understandable, regrettably, these considerations are insufficient to jus tify a downward departure under the guidelines announced under the Sentencing Reform Act (the Act) of 1984, as amended. 1 Accordingly, we must reverse.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilfredo Diaz-VillafaneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Anthony DecologeroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. United States v. Jorge Armando Aguilar-PenaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Terryl L. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. United States v. Mirna Rivera, United States v. Robert AdamoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. AntonakopoulosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. United States v. David Sklar, United States of America v. David SklarCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Michael Barnett, United States of America v. Barry Jordan, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Jack W. BierleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API