Legal Opinion
Mete v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided November 6, 1997No. 92-CV-169 NPMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER
MeCURN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this class action suit, plaintiffs allege that defendants New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities (“OMRDD”) and New York State Department of Civil Service (“DCS”) (collectively “defendants”) discriminated against them on the basis of their age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (“ADEA” or the “Act”), and the New York Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law §§ 290-298 (the “HRL”). Jurisdiction is premised upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 &…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dollinger v. State Insurance FundDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Mete v. NEW YORK STATE OMRDDDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997