Legal Opinion

Marrazzo v. Orino

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1938No. 26720. Department OnePublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

By this suit in equity, plaintiff sought to cancel his agreement to pay defendant Sam Orino seven thousand dollars out of the proceeds of plaintiff’s road building contract.

In substance, in his thirty-one page complaint, plaintiff alleges that he was a contractor engaged in highway construction work in Washington, Oregon, and Idaho; that defendant Sam Orino is a fellow contractor; that defendant Rossi and Rossi Insurance & Investment Company were agents for surety or bonding companies; and that the Aetna Casualty and Surety Company was engaged in the writing of surety or contract bonds.

It is…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Spies v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Card v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Duke v. ForceWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. WappensteinWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. McKee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Woodruff v. McClellanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Kincaid v. LazarIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Pecos Construction Co. v. Mortgage Investment Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Starks v. FieldWashington Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API