State v. Donahue
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.
James Patrick Donahue appeals his conviction for vehicular homicide, contending that evidence of his blood alcohol content was inadmissible. Although the auto accident occurred in Washington, a hospital in Oregon treated Donahue and administered blood tests. We hold that generally the place of treatment determines which physician-patient privilege applies; thus, Oregon’s law is applicable. Under Oregon law, the physician-patient privilege does not apply to criminal proceedings in Oregon; therefore, the physician-patient privilege does not bar the blood test results obtained at the Oregon…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- State v. PowellWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. WittenbargerWashington Supreme Court · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- City of Seattle v. Clark-MunozWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2007
- State v. HeaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.