Legal Opinion
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. Youngblood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 6, 1963No. 39707PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Frankum, Judge.
The judgment affirming the award of the deputy director did not have the effect contended for by the plaintiff in error. While it affirmed that portion of the deputy director’s award which found that the board had no jurisdiction to reopen the case on a change in condition because it was barred by the statute of limitation, all of the other rulings and findings of the deputy director were held to be of no force and effect because the deputy director had exceeded his powers in making those findings. It therefore expressly disapproved the findings of the deputy director to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dover v. DoverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- National Surety Corp. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- American Casualty Co. v. HerronCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE & LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION v. TealCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- LeCraw v. Atlanta Arts Alliance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Jenkins v. Reliance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Crowe v. QUILTED TEXTILE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Armour & Co. v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Armour & Co. v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.