Legal Opinion

Armour & Co. v. Youngblood

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 19, 1966No. 41628Published

1Opinion

*74On Motion for Rehearing.

Bell, Presiding Judge.

The employer in his motion continues to insist that there is pending before the board an application for a hearing to determine a change in condition which fact authorizes the employer to discontinue the payment of compensation until such time as the board shall make a new award on the application. Gentry v. Georgia Cas. &c. Co., 109 Ga. App. 294 (136 SE2d 26); Crowe v. Quilted Textile Corp., 113 Ga. App. 68; Jenkins v. Reliance Ins. Co., 113 Ga. App. 70. There is no merit in this contention as there is no application pending before the board for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Reliance Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. ARMOUR & COMPANY v. YoungbloodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Gentry v. GEORGIA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Crowe v. QUILTED TEXTILE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API