Legal Opinion

Wheeler v. Dietz Hill Development Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1938No. 30243Published

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover an alleged unpaid debt of $1,450 due plaintiff from defendant under a written contract executed by them September 11, 1934. The writing-designated plaintiff, J. C. Wheeler, “party of the first part,”- and defendant, Dietz Hill Development Company, “party of the second part.” The contract permitted defendant to enter upon a 50-acre tract of plaintiff’s land in Cass county and quarry and remove rock therefrom upon the following terms and conditions:

“Party of the second part will enter said premises and build all buildings necessary for the quarrying of rock, having…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hazen v. WilhelmieNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Roman v. BresslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API