Legal Opinion
Hazen v. Wilhelmie
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1903No. 12,695PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Error to tlie district court for Merrick county: James A. Geimison, District Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Lobingier, C.
This is an action to recover for nursery stock alleged to have heen sold and delivered in pursuance of the following contract:
“I have this day bought of L. J. Hazen the following nursery stock, to be packed at the Arlington nursery, at Arlington, Neb., for which I agree to pay him or bearer twelve dollars in cash, on delivery at Grand Island during the fall of 1899.
“I hereby agree to come or send for the goods purchased herein on the day set for delivery, at which time said goods are to be in good order, but after that date will be wholly at my risk.
“It is agreed that the entire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. B. Havens & Co. v. Grand Island Light & Fuel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Roman v. BresslerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. MartinNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co. v. PereauNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nathan v. McKernanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
- Omaha Electric Light & Power Co. v. Union Fuel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Courtesy Flour Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- Patrick v. Norfolk Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
- United States for the Use of Ascher Corporation, a Corporation v. Bradley-Dodson Co., a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.