Snyder v. Patton & Gibson Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by Clinton J. Snyder and Clarence L. Snyder, copartners as C. J? Snyder & Son, against the Patton & Gibson Company for work and labor. There was judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment of $1,197.50, entered against it, upon a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor. The suit was brought to recover an unpaid balance upon an account for labor. The defendant .had taken a contract to do grading, etc., for the Michigan Central Railroad Co. Plaintiffs had done some of this work by contract with Tench, a subcontractor under the defendant, after the completion of which they did some work for the defendant. The claims of the plaintiffs are few and plain. They are:(1) That they graded 289 yards on Jackson cut, at
16f cents per…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Eberts v. Mt. Clemens Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. AdlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
- Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.