Legal Opinion
Bautista v. Juul Labs, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 27, 2021No. 4:20-cv-01613Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIA DE LA LUZ BAUTISTA-PEREZ, Case No. 20-cv-01613-HSG et al., 8 ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO Plaintiffs, DISMISS SECOND AMENDED 9 COMPLAINT AND GRANTING v. MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL 10 CERTIFICATION JUUL LABS, INC., et al., 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 79, 104, 105 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court are Defendant JUUL Labs, Inc.’s (“JLI”) and Defendant 14 Coalition for Reasonable Vaping Regulation’s (“CRVR”) motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second 15 Amended Complaint. Dkt. Nos. 104, 105. Also pending is Plaintiffs’ amended…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.