Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Albertson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 11, 1973No. 7318DC420PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALEY, Judge.

In this appeal the defendant seeks to avoid the payment of an attorney fee under G.S. 6-21.1 upon the ground that his offer of judgment and its acceptance by the plaintiff eliminated any trial, and that only a presiding trial judge can allow an attorney fee to the successful litigant. We do not agree.

Ordinarily, in the absence of any contractual or statutory liability, attorney fees are not recoverable as an item of damages or part of the costs of litigation. Piping, Inc. v. Indemnity Co., 9 N.C. App. 561, 176 S.E. 2d 835; Perkins v. Insurance Co., 4 N.C. App. 466, 167 S.E. 2d 93.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Perkins v. American Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  3. US Piping, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington v. HortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Coastal Production Credit Ass'n v. Goodson Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Hill v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Porterfield v. GoldkuhleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API