The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. . Barbour
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 2, 1920, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff in the year 1912 owned about 2,500 gondola coal cars. It sold to the Central Locomotive and Car Works 2,100 of said cars. It was left with about 350 or 400 cars.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 2, 1920, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant for judgment on the pleadings. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff in the year 1912 owned about 2,500 gondola coal cars. It sold to the Central Locomotive and Car Works 2,100 of said cars. It was left with about 350 or 400 cars. Thereafter it sold to one Wardwell 300 of the cars which were left after the sale to the Central Locomotive and Car Works. There was a dispute between the…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with- costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Feinbloom v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924