Legal Opinion

Feinbloom v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 28, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

The plaintiff sued in equity for the dissolution of an alleged copartnership, and for an accounting. It appears that a written partnership agreement was entered into between the parties on January 10, 1920, to commence from the date thereof. Said agreement provided the plaintiff was to contribute $10,000 in cash. Upon the trial it appeared that the plaintiff had not paid $10,000 in cash, and hence the defendant contended that the partnership never came into existence. It does appear, however, that the day before the contract was signed the plaintiff transferred to the firm a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Lord v. . HullNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Hocking Valley Railway Co. v. BarbourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  4. The Hocking Valley Railway Company v. . BarbourNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API