Legal Opinion
Sparks v. Ross
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided July 5, 1911PublishedCited by 9 opinions
On bill, &c., to quiet title.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaking, Y. C.
A fourth triaL o£ an issue at law in this ease having resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff in the issue, a motion is now made in this court to set aside that verdict.
Since a former trial, a review of which is reported in 75 N. J. Eq. (5 Buch.) 550, two new elements have been added in defence of the claim asserted by the plaintiffs in the issue at law. Evidence has been introduced showing that although Edmund B. *100Boss resided in this state continuously from the date of his marriage to Maria Moose to the date of his marriage to Mary Cavanaugh, a search of the records of the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Chancey v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Keller v. LinsenmyerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1927
- Minter v. Bendix Aviation Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
- Booker v. James Spence Iron Foundry, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Sturm v. SturmNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.