Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 839SC131PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRASWELL, Judge.

What is error? Does the failure to scrupulously follow statutory procedure when taking a guilty plea automatically entitle the defendant to a new trial or other relief? Can a plea of guilty be tied down in a box that is secured with only one color of cord? When is error to be deemed prejudicial and reversible or harmless and upheld?

In his book “The Judicial Process” Judge Ruggero J. Aldisert commented that “[a] reviewing court’s function is to determine whether a trial court committed error of sufficient magnitude to require that its judgment be reversed or vacated.” R.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. BozemanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. In re T.E.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. Sanford Video & News, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API