Legal Opinion
Walker v. Mahoney
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 9, 1996No. 1:94-cv-01407PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge:
Plaintiff Michael Walker, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several state officials employed at the Suffolk County Correctional Facility. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants deprived him of a liberty interest without due process of law by placing him in segregated confinement for a period of 23 days. Pending before the Court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons discussed herein, the defendants’…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roucchio v. CoughlinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Rodriguez v. McGinnisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Wilson v. HarperDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1996
- Laws v. CleaverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001