Legal Opinion

Miller v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 24, 1905No. Appeal, No. 41PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 41, Oct. T., 1905, by Martha A. Shirley, from order of C. P. Armstrong Co., Dec. T., 1904, No. 169, directing issue of peremptory mandamus in case of John W. Miller v. Harry B. Henderson, register of wills. Petition for mandamus. Before Patton, P. J. Tlie facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was order awarding mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Bbown,

Robert Miller died July 7, 1904. His will, executed September 21, 1894, was admitted to probate by the register of wills of Armstrong county, July 28,1904. The testator named a nephew, John W. Miller, the appellee, as executor, but at the time of the probate of the will he was in confinement in the hospital for the insane at Dixmont, having been committed to that institution by the court of quarter sessions of Armstrong county on April 15, 1904, under the provisions of the Act of assembly of April 20, 1869, 'P. L. 78. He had not been adjudged a lunatic, but, on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mathews v. BiddellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  2. Hunter v. VoigtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schenley Farms Co. v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Dick v. Blaker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Delaware County1933
  3. Williams v. Wilkes-Barre Firemen's Relief & Pension Ass'n, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Luzerne County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API