Legal Opinion

State v. Neill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 12, 2007No. D041467M; A126766PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of interfering with a peace officer. ORS 162.247(l)(b). She assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence and her motion for a judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

The following facts are essentially undisputed. Police officers were dispatched to defendant’s apartment after her son called 9-1-1 and reported that he had been involved in a fight with another man (later identified as defendant’s boyfriend, Hardy) in the apartment and that he was concerned about defendant’s safety because she and Hardy were alone in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  2. State v. Illig-RennOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. BurgerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. GaffneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. State v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. KreisOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. BistrikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. BistrikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  4. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. NavickasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API